Whisky Chat: Do you like Whisky?     Yeah.. We do too!

What’s the difference between bourbon and whisky?

Bourbon drinkers swear by Bourbon. Whiskey drinkers swear by whiskey. And they both swear at each other, proclaiming the indisputable superiority of their drink over the other. The rest of the world stands back, bemused, wonders what all the fuss is about, and hopes that matters don’t turn violent. In honor of Bourbon Month, Drinking 101 examines the differences, and the debate between these two similar, yet wholly incongruous spirits.

Devout bourbon drinkers will instinctively dispute the following blasphemy, but bourbon and whiskey share a similar derivation: whiskey. Bourbonites are not moved by the fact bourbon is, in truth, called bourbon whiskey, and thus the speed at which rational discussion breaks down is not terribly surprising.

So what is the difference? It has to do with preparation, though as described in the Mr. Boston Official Bartender’s Guide, the differences are subtle:

Whiskeys are distilled from a fermented mash of grain (usually corn, rye, barley or wheat) and then aged in oak barrels.

Bourbon Whiskey is distilled from a mash of grain containing not less than 51 percent corn and is normally aged four years in new charcoal oak barrels.

So why the empassioned contention? It’s mostly territorial. Bourbon gets it’s name from “Old Bourbon” County, Kentucky, whence this type of whiskey first gained popularity and general distribution (circa 1800). In a demonstration of regional pride, and jealousy, distillers in neighboring territories developed their own whiskeys. The characteristic sugar-maple, Tennessee whiskey is one that survived, and in 1941 received legal recognition in the US as a separate style. Distinct from bourbon simply because of how it is filtered, and where it is made, yet you couldn’t convince a Kentucky bourbon loyalist that Tennessee whiskey is anywhere similar in color, viscosity or taste, and certainly not quality.

While the inherent differences are slight, it is the philosophical disparity that keeps whiskey and bourbon at odds. Those who favor Kentucky bourbon do not necessarily despise whiskey for being whiskey, or for not being bourbon, they hate it for it’s association with Tennessee whiskey. And by birthright, Tennessee whiskey drinkers hate bourbon for not being Jack Daniels.

So, the argument makes as much sense now as it ever has, and as much sense as it will make the next time you here two bar-rags hashing it out in your local saloon. The best advice is to move away from the combatants, order a beer, or some neutral spirit, and accept that there are some issues you may never understand, and in which you needn’t participate.

(Source: http://www.examiner.com)

  • haha, im drunk right now off some makers mark 46!!! good stuff man….

    Iv always wondered what the real difference is. what funnny **it. this Makers Mark is my personal favorite and seeing as there’s a limited supply left, im a proud, drunk as hell, owner!

  • all I know, cheap bourbon or cheap whiskey taste like s**t while the good stuff, Woodford Reserve or the above mentioned Makers Mark Kentucky Bourbon and Jack Daniels and Wild Turkey Tennessee sourmash whiskey taste great. But if you really want a decent drink try Glenlevitt or Glenfiddich 12 year old single malt scotch.

  • Hi, I think your blog might be having browser
    compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Firefox, it looks
    fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, superb blog!

    • Thanks for the heads-up.
      But, since making things work in IE is generally worse than making sure they are OK in standards based browsers I would rather the site display fine in FF / Chrome etc.

      –Tom

  • So being a bartender for some 15 years have never thought to seek the truth of difference. I’ve worked several years in an Irish pub thinking whiskey was a generally a sweeter finish as opposed the the darker bourbon flavor.As the budget went down so did the quality of order. Jameson to Jim Beam. Although hard to swallow at first the taste had a nice smooth finish that i could not find in other whiskeys. None to say the less to my surprise Jim labels themselves as a bourbon/whiskey. Never the less it got the job done. “For those that drink, it’s not about the stink, it’s the think!!!!” And may the rest of life learn to relax.

  • Do all whiskey made in the U.S.have to include the word Bourbon on the label except those made in Tn.?

    • No they do not have to include the word Bourbon.
      There are many white whiskies made in the U.S. that only have the word Whiskey on the label.
      There are specific laws that have to be followed for the use of the word “Bourbon”.
      This is why the Tenn. Whiskies are called that and not Bourbon.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks